Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Politics. Show all posts

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Health Care Mess in US

Everybody is talking about the healthcare reform in US these days. I just want to write my point of view on this. Here in US if you are rich or if you’re poor you will be fine in getting the access to the health care. Rich have great insurance and poor have Medicaid/Medicare program to pay for their health.

In Medicare, medical bills are paid from trust funds which those covered have paid into. Tax payers pay certain percentage of their income to fund the trust. It serves people over 65 primarily, whatever their income; and serves younger disabled people and dialysis patients. Patients pay part of costs through deductibles for hospital and other costs. Small monthly premiums are required for non-hospital coverage. Medicare is a federal program. It is basically the same everywhere in the United States and is run by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, an agency of the federal government.

Medicaid is the federal/state program where it gets the fund from federal state and local tax to serve the low income people of any age. This means the tax payers pay the health care of the poor and low income people who most of the time doesn’t pay taxes. If your income is not qualified to get the Medicaid, you have to get your insurance from the private insurance companies. These are several types of private insurance companies and most come is Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS).

If you’re rich you don’t have problem in getting the better private insurance plan. But if you are a middle class and your income is barely above the lower income group then you may not afford for any kind of insurance. Even if you can afford to get certain type of private insurance your pocket expense will be very high if you or family members get sick.

In US emergency care charges 3 or 4 times more than the regular clinic visit. For example if you don’t have the insurance and you take your child to a regular clinic for runny nose, the cost of seeing a physician will be around 60 dollars. But for the same condition if you go to ER it will cost you 250- 300 dollars.

I would like to categorize how different income level plays a role in the healthcare system in USA


Poor and lower income:

Insurance: Medicaid plan-Paid by the Tax payers
Emergency care: No need to pay. Fully covered by Medicaid plan
Tax: They don’t pay taxes even if it is they pay it should very small
Pocket expense for sickness: None
Medications: No need to pay – Medicaid pays
Surgery: No need to pay – Medicaid pays
Seeing a specialist: No need to pay – Medicaid pays

Contributing to their future insurance-after 65years (Medicare): None


Lower- middle class:

Insurance: Most of the time they cannot afford any kind of private insurance
Emergency care: Pays from pocket
Tax: Pays tax
Pocket expense for sickness: A lot
Medications: Pays from pocket
Surgery: Pays from pocket
Seeing a specialist: Pays from pocket
Paying insurance for others (Medicaid) by paying tax: Yes
Contributing to their future insurance-after 65years (Medicare): Yes

This group doesn’t have the insurance of their own but they have to pay the insurance for poor and lower income people via Medicaid. They also have to contribute to their own federally funded insurance program- Medicare for which they can be eligible only after 65years of age. These group most of the time suffer without any health care and they go bankrupt very often.

Mid middle class:

Insurance: Some kind of private insurance with high co pay
Emergency care: Depends on how much insurance covers. Most of the time
they pay significant amount from their pocket.
Tax: Pays tax
Pocket expense for sickness: Depends on how much insurance covers. Most of
the time they pay significant amount from their pocket
Medications: Depends on how much insurance covers. Most of the time they
pay significant amount from their pocket
Surgery: Depends on how much insurance covers. Most of the time they pay
significant amount from their pocket
Seeing a specialist Depends on how much insurance covers. Most of the time
they pay significant amount from their pocket
Paying insurance for others (Medicaid) by paying tax: Yes
Contributing to their future insurance-after 65years (Medicare): Yes.

Even though this group has some kind of insurance they still pay a lot for their health care cost and even some of the goes bankrupt in this group because of their healthcare cost.


Upper Middle Class:

Insurance: Good Insurance-Private
Emergency care: Pay less from the pocket depends on the insurance
Tax: Pays tax
Pocket expense for sickness: Fair
Medications: Covered mostly by insurance. Pays a little from pocket
Surgery: Covered mostly by insurance. Pays a little from pocket
Seeing a specialist: Covered mostly by insurance. Pays a little from pocket
Paying insurance for others (Medicaid) by paying tax : Yes
Contributing to their future insurance-after 65years (Medicare):Yes


Upper Class:

Insurance: Very Good Insurance-Private
Emergency care: Pay less from the pocket depends on the insurance
Tax: Pays tax
Pocket expense for sickness: Almost none
Medications: Covered by insurance. Pays a very little from pocket
Surgery: Covered by insurance. Pays very little from pocket
Seeing a specialist: Covered by insurance. Pays very little from pocket
Paying insurance for others (Medicaid) by paying tax : Yes
Contributing to their future insurance-after 65years (Medicare):Yes

Note: There is no clear income definition for middle and upper class in US


How we got into it ?

To qualify for Medicaid your gross income should be less than 13,000 dollars/year i.e. you should be below 133% of poverty level. For better private insurance you need a gross income of $70000-90000 dollars/year. Average American gross income is 50,000 dollars per year- as of 2007 income data. These means most of the American don’t have good insurance. Lot of them doesn’t have insurance at all but still they have to pay for the poor and low income people. To me this is unfair. You pay for others but you don’t have one for yourself. It is like you have to put your money in a pot to keep it full all the time but it has been constantly drained and enjoyed by people who don’t contribute to that. You may go bankrupt because of your healthcare cost but you have to still take care of others healthcare who don’t even pay a single penny to it.

Why healthcare cost so much?

In this country most of the time physicians are not free to think and do what is right for the patient. This is because people sue the physician for everything. Physicians are constantly under the watch by the lawyers for the malpractice. Since there is always a fear of malpractice sue among the physicians, they ordered bunch of lab test to avoid any malpractice sue even if it is not needed. Doctors charge more because insurance pay them back less than what they asked for. Moreover they also have to pay for their malpractice insurance. They have to bill all these expenses on the patient .In addition to that, drug companies don’t want to let their drugs go generic or reduce the price of their branded drugs All these expenses fall on the patient’s pocket and ultimately to the society


What do we do about it?

There are no real solutions to these issues. This is what I think we can do to make the healthcare system better. There should be a federally/state/locally funded universal health care available for every American irrespective of their income. Option of choosing a private insurance instead of universal health care should be offered to every American. But everybody has to contribute whether they want to participate in the universal healthcare system or not. This way tax payer gets their benefit of paying the tax by getting healthcare for themselves instead just paying for others. That funded program should act like Medicare to all age group.



Currently everybody has to contribute to Medicare which pays the health care to seniors 65years or older irrespective of their past and present income. In current Medicare you can supplement your coverage by buying more private insurance. Same kind of principle should apply to the all the age group under the universal healthcare. This way people have the option of choosing either the universal health care system as their sole insurance or supplementing their universal health care system with other private insurance.



Universal health care means is healthcare for everybody but also giving the choice supplementing it with other insurance. It should not be literally free otherwise people started abusing it. Every body should be charged some kind of co-pay to the clinic visit, ER visit and prescription based on the income status. Even for lower income have to pay some co-pay. For ER visit co-pay should be higher than the regular clinic visit this way we can avoid flooding the ER for just simple health condition which would have been treated next day in the outpatient clinic. If you charge even 10 dollars as a co pay for ER visit to the lower income you will dramatically reduce the healthcare cost burden.

Malpractice lawsuit should be regulated. Malpractice amount cap should be imposed. To avoid lab errors and doing unnecessary labs, universal electronic health record system should be implemented. Universal electronic health record makes the any doctor anywhere in US to access the patient’s record. This will reduce repetitive test and labs on a patient.
Doctors doing unnecessary lab test should reimbursed less on their payments and good doctors should be rewarded with better reimbursement. Universal healthcare should pay only set number sick visits to the clinic and ER. Extra visits and other privileges can be supplement by buying additional private insurance. More emphasis should be placed on yearly screening.

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

A Snap of Indian Politics

India’s election is over and Indians were very clear. People are always saying that the Indian elections are unpredictable. I don’t think so. Indian people know what they want and it is the political analyst who cannot read their minds. In the last 3 elections Indian politics were dominated by caste and religious groups. Local parties had very strong influence in deciding who is coming to the power. Every body though that they were the next Prime Minister. We did not have clear leader until this election to tell the people to whom they are voting for.. It is not people’s mind is unpredictable, it is parties leadership and their PM candidate were unpredictable.

After independence, Prime Minister Candidates from Indian National Congress party ruled the country until 1977. Indira Gandhi was the Prime Ministers for three consecutive terms from 1966 to 1977. After 1977 the country started seeing Prime Ministers from a party other than Indian national congress. Janata party which came out of Indian national congress started ruling the country for next 3 years with two different Prime Ministers (Morarji Desai and Charan Singh).

Indira Gandhi became the Prime Minister again after that and she was in power from 1980-1984. On October 31st 1984 she was assassinated by her own Sikh body guards, who were dissatisfied by her action at golden temple in Amritsar, Punjab. Rajiv Gandhi became the Prime Minister followed by her mother’s assassination. He was in power from 1984-1990.
Followed by Rajiv Gandhi’s full term there were Prime Ministers, who came to power from the coalition of small and regional parties. They were V.P Singh from Janata Dal party (1989-1990) and Chandra Shekhar from Samjawadi Janata Party (1990-1991).

On May 21 1991 during the election campaign, Rajiv Gandhi was assassinated by LTTE in Tamilnadu, India. Following a sympathy wave due to Rajiv Gandhi’s assassination, congress party came to power under leadership of Narashima Rao (1991- 96).

BJP (Bhartiya Janata Party), a Hindu conservative party was formed by Vajpayee and L.K Advani on 1980. On Dec 6th 1992 Babri Mosque was demolished by a group Hindu activist and parties lead by BJP. They were demanding that Babri Mosque was built on the place where Samrat Shri Ramachandra, an ancient King of India was born. BJP wanted to build a temple for Ram in that place after the demolition of Babri Mosque. That demolition fueled the hatred that was already there between Muslims and Hindus in India.

After a full term of government led by Narashima Rao (Congress party) congress was at a historic low at 1996 election, and a vast medley of regional parties and break-off factions dominated the hung parliament. Since there was no clear majority for single party to form the government, Indian President asked Vajpayee to form the government with support of other parties. He was a Prime Minister only for 13 days and he resigned when it became clear that he could not garner a majority.

Once again country saw 2 Prime Ministers from coalition of regional parties. They were Deva Gowda from Janata Dal (1996-97) and I K Gujaral from Janata Dal (1997-1998.)

People cannot find a party to give a stable government for them. They looked at BJP and decided to give a chance. BJP was campaigning that they are the one to save the country from Muslim extremists and to build a temple for Ram at Ayodhya on the location where the Babri Mosque was existed. BJP came to power under Vajpayee leadership (1998- 2004) but they never built anything at Ayodhya.

No leader in the country that the people can trust on.Meanwhile Sonia Gandhi was avoiding involving herself and her kids in the politics after her husband’s assassination (Rajiv Gandhi). She didn’t want to come to the politics but her husband’s party members were begging her to involve in politics.

Sonia Gandhi led United Progressive Alliance (led by congress party) to a surprise electoral victory on 2004 Indian election. Sonia Gandhi declined the opportunity to assume the office of Prime Minister after the 2004 election results and made Manmohan Singh as the Prime Minister.

This election people saw a clear leadership under Sonia Gandhi. They are impressed with Sonia Gandhi’s leadership and Rahul Gandhi’s charisma. People gave big majority for Sonia Gandhi’s leadership and Manmohan Singh’s honesty. It is all about leadership on this election. People threw all the small regional parties out and trusted on congress party. This shows if we show a good leader to the people we can extinguish all the caste and religious party ideas in India. People also showed in this election that they found a leader for their future. It is Rahul Gandhi, son of Rajiv/Sonia Gandhi.

Sunday, May 17, 2009

Is it the End ?

Lots of people have been killed in Sri Lanka in the name of peace war. Sri Lankan army is celebrating the victory today. A body was found in the previously LTTE controlled part. Sri Lankan army is speculating it may be prabhkaran's body. Report says 300 LTTE members committed suicide when the Sri Lankan army surrounded them yesterday.
To me the biggest mistake that LTTE made was killing India's Ex-priminister- Rajiv Gandhi. Report was saying that he was going to lose the election that was held on 1991. LTTE suicide bombers, Gayatri and Dhau on May 21st 1991, carried out the assassination of Rajiv Gandhi. That created a sympathy wave for congress (Rajiv Gandhi’s party) that year and a big anger and hatred wave for LTTE. LTTE was branded as a terrorist group. It lost all the support from Tamilians living in Tamilnadu. Talking and supporting LTTE became a Taboo in India and Tamilnadu.

Sri Lanka president picked a correct moment to destroy the LTTE. Tamils in Tamilnadu cannot ask for the Indian government support to stop the war against LTTE because congress party currently runs Indian government and LTTE killed their leader. Prabahkaran, the LTTE leader is on wanted list by Indian government. So Indian government would be happy to see the end of the LTTE.

So what is next? During the war Sri Lankan government was saying that if India would intervene to stop the war they would go to China and Pakistan for support. Now that is not going to happen because war is over without any Indian government involvement. Indian government may have more leverage over the Sri Lankan government now than before and they started doing some humanitarian help to people affected in the war. Indian government may insist the Sri Lankan’s government to proceed for the peace talk with other Tamil leader in Sri Lanka to get better recognition for Tamils in Sri Lanka. We will see what is going to happen. It is very hard to predict. LTTE may regroup later on and  will slowly get their territory back in Sri Lanka.

Friday, May 15, 2009

Indian Parliment


Lok Sabha

The Lok Sabha is also known as the "House of the People" or the lower house. Almost all of its members are directly elected by citizens of India. It is the more powerful of the two houses and can precede or overrule the Rajya Sabha (upper house) in certain matters.

The Lok Sabha can have up to 552 members as envisaged in the Constitution of India (Article 81). It has a term of 5 years but it may be dissolved earlier by the President in the event of no party getting a majority. Its duration may also be increased during any national emergency. To be eligible for membership of Lok Sabha, a person must be a citizen of India and must not be less than 25 years of age. Up to 530 members can be elected from the states, up to 20 members from the Union territories and no more than two members can be nominated by the President of India.

As of now, the Lok Sabha has 545 members, 530 members from the states, 13 members from the Union territories and two nominated members representing the Anglo Indian community. Some seats are reserved for representatives of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.

The representatives from States and Union territories are directly elected by the people on the basis of universal adult suffrage. Every citizen who is over 18 years of age, irrespective of gender, caste, religion or race, who is otherwise not disqualified, is eligible to vote.

Raja Sabha

The Rajya Sabha is also known as "Council of States" or the upper house. Its members are indirectly elected by members of legislative bodies of the States.

The Rajya Sabha has 250 members in all. Elections to it are scheduled and the chamber cannot be dissolved. Each member has a term of 6 years and elections are held for one-third of the seats after every 2 years. The composition is specified in Article 80 of the Constitution of India.

12 members are nominated by the President from people having special knowledge or experience in literature, science, art or social services.
Representatives of States are elected by the elected members of the Legislative Assembly of the State in accordance with system of proportional representation by means of single transferable vote.
Representatives of Union Territories are indirectly elected by members of an electoral college for that territory in accordance with system of proportional representation.
The Council of States is designed to maintain the federal character of the country. The number of members from a state depends on the population of the state (e.g. 31 from Uttar Pradesh and one from Nagaland).

The minimum age for a person to become a member of Rajya Sabha is 30 years

Thursday, May 14, 2009

UPA to get 216 seats, NDA 177: NDTV exit poll - Yahoo! India News

 UPA is projected to emerge as the largest alliance in the Lok Sabha polls with 216 seats, leaving the NDA far behind, according to NDTV's exit poll. The exit poll gave NDA 177 seats while the Third Front was projected to get 105, Fourth Front 30 and others 15.The poll projected that Third Front, mainly constituting BSP, would emerge the largest grouping in Uttar Pradesh, bagging 28 out of 80 seats. The Fourth Front, mainly comprising Samajwadi Party, was predicted to get 23, which would be a reduction of 12 seats from the 2004 elections.NDA was projected to get 14 seats, closely followed by UPA at 13, according to the poll. In Maharashtra which has 48 Lok Sabha seats, the exit poll gave NDA 19 seats, six less than the last elections, while UPA was projected to improve its tally by seven seats to reach 29.
UPA to get 216 seats, NDA 177: NDTV exit poll - Yahoo! India News

US wants to do 'open' business with new Indian govt - Yahoo! India News

New Delhi, May 14 (PTI) Expressing the US' admiration for India's "event free" elections, a top US military official today said the Obama Administration looked forward to doing "open, candid" business with the new government, even as Washington pursued three important defence agreements with New Delhi. US Pacific Command chief Admiral Timothy J Keating, who held discussions with top Indian officials here, told reporters that the US had respect and admiration for the democratic process in India, where 800 million people voted in a month-long process of electing a new government."We have respect and admiration for India conducting a relatively event free elections. The US looks forward to dealing in the same manner in open, candid manner in with we deal, as we did earlier, with the new government," he said.Asked if he discussed with the Indian officials the three important cooperation deals -- the End User Monitoring Agreement (EUMA), Logistics Support Agreement (LSA) and Communication Interoperability and Security Monitoring Agreement (CISMOA) -- that US was pursuing for some time, Keating said Washington looked forward to successful conclusion of the agreements and that Foreign Secretary Shivshankar Menon, with whom he interacted on them, understood the US' desire to see the deal through so that both sides could get on with more important matters. PTI.
US wants to do 'open' business with new Indian govt - Yahoo! India News